玛格丽特.杜拉斯是法国当代著名的小说家、剧作家、记者和电影艺术家。70岁那年,她的自传体小说《情人》获得1984年的龚古尔文学奖——法国最高文学奖项。杜拉斯的父母都是法国小学教师，因轻信当时政府的宣传，背井离乡来到法属印度支那殖民地（越南西贡），希望能在当地发财。但父亲在玛格丽特年幼时就因病告别了人世，留下母亲玛丽·多纳迪厄一人靠微薄的薪金抚养3个孩子，家境非常贫寒。

第一次知道杜拉斯是在王小波的《一只特立独行的猪》里，王小波对作者杜拉斯及译者王道乾都极为推崇，他说“就如达.芬奇画出了他的杰作，别人不肯看，那是别人的错，不是达.芬奇的错；米开朗琪罗雕出了他的杰作，别人不肯看，那是别人的错，不是米开朗琪罗的错。现代小说有这样的杰作，人若不肯看小说，那是人的错，不是小说的错。”《情人》就是这样一部小说。

鬓飞霜雪的杜拉斯用饱含深情的文字写出《情人》，晦涩难懂的文字，现实和回忆交织的架构，澎湃又低沉的情感，会让人无所适从。她的书是需要反复阅读的，我觉得看任何小说，都要了解作者的生平性格爱好，小说描写的生活场景，只要慢慢捋顺这些的脉络，就会明白作者想表达什么，会有柳暗花明的欣喜。小说开始非常简单，年纪愈大，我愈认可大道至简，敢于如此开头的人，往往比较彻悟：

我已经老了。

有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有一个男人向我走来。他主动介绍自己，他对我说：“我认识你，永远记得你。那时候，你还很年轻，人人都说你美，现在，我是特为来告诉你，对我来说，我觉得现在你比年轻的时候更美，那时你是年轻女人，与你那时的面貌相比，我更爱你现在备受摧残的面容。”

“继而引出极度的痛苦，深可悲戚的情景，而运笔又偏于枯冷，激情潜于其下，悲剧内容既十分沉重又弥漫全篇，很是低沉悲伤。” ——译者王道乾

在爱情的开始时杜拉斯是这样叙述的：“才十八岁,就已经是太迟了。在十八岁和二十五岁之间，我原来的面貌早已不知去向。我在十八岁的时候就变老了。……在一生最年轻的岁月，最可赞叹的年华，在这样的时候,那时间来去匆匆,有时会突然让你感到震惊。衰老的过程是冷酷无情的。我眼看着衰老在我颜面上步步紧逼,一点点侵蚀，我的面容各有关部位也发生了变化，两眼变得越来越大，目光变得凄切无神,嘴变得更加固定僵化，额上刻满了深深的裂痕。”还在青春年华时，作者就已经在哀伤容颜已逝；当她年老时，却依旧渴盼心仪的情人主动来找她——不但爱她年轻时的脸庞，更爱她现在备受摧残的面容。依旧是少女情怀，对爱情的向往从未失去。

只有到了一定的年龄，并且修炼到了一定境界，才能理解作者这种低沉的、略带悲凉的自恋。冷漠的母亲，贪婪的大哥，懦弱的.小哥，生活是那么的无助。在高档餐厅里，烛光晚餐进行中，情人居高临下地笑着宣布，我不能娶你，因为你已经不是处女了。她边抓紧时间狼吞虎咽边同样笑着回答，那太好了，反正我不喜欢中国人。他对她说：“你来找我，是为了钱。”她于是跟着说：“我来找你，是为了钱。”绝望是那么的彻底。

文化无国界，人心无国界。倘若有区别，那一定是制度和环境导致的。虚伪、贪婪、懦弱、好斗、妒忌、敏感……，在作者的笔下，和我的乡下何尝有什么区别？这里绝无贬低之意，我爱我的家乡和家人，我直面人性的光辉和鄙下，我和作者一样——纵使世人皆嫌我弃我，也绝不妨碍我的自悦自喜！对自己好的只有自己。70岁的作者通过书中主人公的自述，向我们表达了她对美好生活的幻想和对爱情的追求。在杜拉斯的传记里，最后说到了杜拉斯的床头放着那个中国情人的大幅照片，那张照片一直陪伴着杜拉斯，直到终老。有人说，得不到的永远是最好的——那一定是写给别人看的。实际上珍惜得到的才是正解。现实中，作者杜拉斯在70岁时找了一个27岁的小鲜肉，陪她走完余生，何其快哉！她会是痴迷于梦中情人的人吗？

《情人》的读后感篇2

除却雨果的《巴黎圣母院》和巴尔扎克的《高老头》，记忆中很少读法国作家的作品吧，这两周抽时间读完了杜拉斯的《情人》一书，虽不甚明白，但终究还是稍有体会。正如译者所言，杜拉斯的作品是深涩难懂的，时间空间人物的转换过快，往往使得读者迷惑而不知其所言何物。

我已经老了。简单的开头，却不知承载了多少岁月的沧桑，世事的煎熬，容颜的摧残；又不知有多少的自悦自喜，心醉神迷，流连忘返，恐怕只有杜拉斯自己能够明白其中的滋味吧。冷漠的母亲，贪婪的大哥，懦弱的小哥，绝望是那么的彻底。然而，终有一天，她遇见了自己的情人，自己也不清楚到底存不存在爱情的情人，只是知道，她需要他，而他也需要她。当白日已尽，他们在一起相互取暖，相互慰藉；有时，她会莫名觉得眼前这人像是自己的父亲，但就是这样他们彼此拥有。可是后来，他们不能在一起。港口消失了，接着，陆地也消失了。航船横越大洋，她最后还是走了。再后来，经历几次结婚，生孩子，离婚；最后，他带着他的女人来到巴黎。他给她打来电话，她一听声音，就听出是他。他说：我仅仅想听听你的声音。她说：是我，你好。后来他不知道和她再说什么。故事到此为止，仅此而已，你不知还会发生什么，但那不重要了，是吧？毕竟往事已成追忆。总体来说，小说大多关于爱情、死、希望这些观念。没有爱的爱情，爱的对象便变成了“物”。“继而引出极度的痛苦，深可悲戚的情景，而运笔又偏于枯冷，激情潜于其下，悲剧内容既十分沉重又弥漫全篇，很是低沉悲伤。” ——王道乾

《情人》的读后感篇3

我已经老了，有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有一个男人向我走来。他主动介绍自己，他对我说：“我认识你，永远记得你。那时候，你还很年轻，人人都说你美，现在，我是特意来告诉你，对我来说，我觉得现在你比年轻的时候更美，那时你是年轻女人，与你那时的面貌相比，我更爱你现在备受摧残的面容。”

就是这段《情人》的开头描写，让人忍不住一窥究竟。杜拉斯最出名的小说，电影由梁家辉主演。一直想看，但一直拖延没看，这次读书小组里开始阅读这本书，一开始，我是欣喜的。可是才看下去，我就开始崩溃了，这是什么玩意！看得很吃力，人称的随意更换，时间线各种错乱，零零碎碎的句子描写，各种大长句，真的让人看得崩溃，而且很失望。才看了百分之七就放下了，今天到截止时间，要交读书笔记了，我才耐着性子继续看下去。

直到半小时前这本书看了百分之八十，我都是厌烦了。可是最后的一章，我居然开始能跟随小说了。前文不断描写的各种回忆，无能母亲，暴力的大哥，懦弱的小哥哥，这些角色的描述和回忆都非常多。对于真正的情人，那个中国男人却描述很少。可是最后一章，他们分别之时的场景描写，却让我心醉。

这本书这么出名，真的是有道理的。读完之后的感受一时无法形容，让人惊叹于作者的文笔。那种无力、绝望、悲戚之感扑面而来。突然你就原谅了前文的种种混乱的回忆描写。直到分离，她才知道，她是爱他的。可是，一切已成定局，不是么。最后的那个电话，那时她已老去，他却还爱着她。他根本不能不爱她，他说他爱她将一直爱到他死。这时你再回想起那些散乱的回忆，你却好像融入到她的爱情，她的一生之中。

《情人》的读后感篇4

eading report of sons and lovers during my extracurricular time, i started reading sons and lovers, which was written by david herbert lawrence. he was an english novelist, poet, playwright, essayist, literary critic and painter who published as d. h. lawrence. he was born on september 11, 1885 to a miner and his wife in the small village of eastwood near nottingham, england. arthur and lydia lawrence, his parents, had a troublesome marriage from the start: his father, a miner, was content to stay on the mining grounds while his mother yearned to leave. so his childhood was dominated by poverty and friction between his parents. he was educated at nottingham high school, and won a scholarship. he worked as a clerk in a surgical appliance factory, and then for four years as a pupil-teacher. he was died in vence, france on march 2, 1930. lawrence is now valued by many as a visionary thinker and significant representative of modernism in english literature. there is a background before the author wrote this book. lawrence lived at a time when the industrial revolution was taking on the whole world, especially in great britain, which changed from agricultural society towards industrial society. and it brought all changes in national and personal lives. lawrence?s novel sons and lovers deals with lawrence?s personal experiences in the working-class environment in nottinghamshire.

sons and lovers is the third published novel of d. h. lawrence, taken by many to be his earliest masterpiece. it tells the story of paul morel, a young man and a budding artist. this autobiographical novel is a brilliant evocation of life in a working class mining community. this novel is about the life of movels. mr.morel, mrs.moel, paul, miriam and clara are the main characters in this novel. the author develops the story by portraying the relationships between these characters. but the end of the relationship is a tragedy. i divided this book into two parts. now i will introduce the first part of this book.

the refined daughter of a good old burgher family, gertrude coppard meets a rough-hewn miner at a christmas dance and falls into a whirlwind romance. but soon after her marriage to walter morel, she realizes the difficulties of living off his meager salary in a rented house. the couple fight and drift apart and walter retreats to the pub after work each day. gradually, mrs.morel?s

affections shift to her sons, beginning with the oldest, william. as a boy, william is so attached to his mother that he doesn?t enjoy the fair without her. as he grows older, he defends her against his father?s occasional violence. eventually, he leaves home for a job in london, where he begins to rise up into the middle class. he is engaged, but he detests the girl?s superficiality. he dies, and mrs. morel is heartbroken, but when william catches pneumonia, she rediscovers her love for her second son. both repulsed by and drawn to his mother, paul is afraid to leave her but wants to go out on his own, and needs to experience love. gradually, he falls into a relation ship with miriam, a farm girl who attends his church. the two take long walks and have intellectual conversations about books, but resists in, in part because his mother looks down on her.

i want to introduce the three characters of this book: mr. morel, mrs morel and miriam leviers. mr. morel is paul's rough, sensual, hard-drinking father. in many ways, he is his wife's opposite. mr. morel is from a lower-class mining family. he speaks the local dialect in contrast to his wife's refined english. he loves to drink and dance practices that mrs. morel, a strict congregationalist, considers sinful. mrs morel is one of the most formidable mothers in all of western literature. to the narrator, and perhaps to paul morel, she is both a giving, selfless nurturer of her children and a possessive tyrant. miriam leviers, paul's teenage friend and sweetheart, was modeled after lawrence's own young love, miriam is paul's devoted helpmate in his artistic and spiritual quests. although beautiful, she takes no pleasure in her physical attributes. her whole life is geared towards heaven and a mystical sense of nature.

this is the most autobiographical of all lawrence?s works as the author himself had a similar relationship with his own mother. the use of this oedipal theme is one of a number of freudian concepts he used throughout his books. like many of his works, sons and lovers was criticized when first published for obscenity and one publisher called it the dirtiest book he had ever read, but compared to his later works it is quite constrained.

there are three females that paul had loved. the first person is his mother. paul is afraid to leave her but wants to go out on his own, and experience love. then, it is miriam, whom is a farm girl. they have intellectual conversations about books in the nature. at last, paul meets clara dawes, who has separated

from her husband, paul get physical satisfaction from her.

i want to show my opinions about the love between paul and miriam.miriam leviers, paul's teenage friend and sweetheart, was modeled after lawrence's own young love. she is romantic in her soul but timid and sensitive in appearance. miriam is paul's devoted helpmate in his artistic and spiritual quests. although beautiful, she takes no pleasure in her physical attributes. her whole life is geared towards heaven and a mystical sense of nature. miriam is paul?s first lover. miriam loves paul, but she can?t admit to and has no courage to love. when she loves paul, she only wants to dominate his mind, then to catch paul?s whole soul. but paul knows that miriam only loves his soul and wants to posses him. in this book, there is a dialogue between them which paul rejected miriam. miriam said: you had said that we belong to each other. i was young. i did belong to my mother and now she is died. i don?t want to live again with you, not even with you. i?m sure i?ll never find one as good as you, but perhaps i understand at last what the mean to live, said paul. for paul, mother?s love makes him unhappy, while miriam seems like his mother as both want to control his soul. of course, he will against that form of love as he thinks that?s not love and wants to escape from this spiritual love. i think the love was failed because of miriam?s possession.

then, i?d like to compare lawrence as a combination of both william and paul. as william, he was a man who grew in such family and had a strong will to break the shackles of his class. william was gifted, he was successful in both his academy work and interpersonal relational, and he escaped from his lamentable family to london. the mentality of william just like lawrence purred his feel to this character subconsciously: the disgust of his father, admiration of mother, struggle to free himself from the mournful family. all these characteristics are based on author himself experience. of course, these stuffs also connected with the society at that time, which class you came from can be the first to affect who you were or how you were, in order to change your social status, the post important was to change the class you belonged to. all these ideology created both lawrence and his william.

at the moment, it?s clear that paul?s oedipus complex and reasons. actually paul has not become a normal adult by getting over some problems like

other children. that is not only determined by his mother?s abnormal maternity. the reasons are in many ways, some comes from the parents; some comes from his sisters and brothers, some even from the society, the mechanical civilization, which leads to the family tragedy and distortion of personality.

《情人》的读后感篇5

d.h.lawrence and his sons and lovers sons and lovers was regarded as his autobiography, actually, i strongly agree with this view. isquo;d like to compare the novel with lawrence in the following three aspects: family background, the shackle of class and oedipus complex. first is the background. as to d.h.lawrence, he was born in a family which his father was a miner who hardly received any education, instead of his mother with well education and her personal ideal of the politics or philosophy. compared with sons and lovers, the herosquo;s family is similar with lawrencesquo;s-----vulgar father, well-educated mother. the father who works as a miner, nothing like to do but drinking, his words usually can be rude no matter what to his wife or his children;

the mother, a well educated lady, fell in love with mr. morels accidently, but the reality finally defeated her romance, the humble and mediocre life struck her dream of being honorable. all in all, these situations are reflection of lawrencesquo;s life, not only the characteristics of parents but also the surroundings, like working in the mine, living a strapped life and so on. secondly, to a certain degree, isquo;d like to compare lawrence as a combination of both william and paul (the eldest son and younger son in the novel). as william, he was a man who grew in such family and had a strong will to break the shackles of his class. william was gifted, he was successful in both his academy work and interpersonal relationship, and he escaped from his lamentable family to london. the mentality of william just like lawrencesquo;s that a canary in the cage who tried to get away to the broad sky. so in this aspect, i think lawrence purred his feel to this character subconsciously: the disgust of his father, admiration of his mother, struggle to free himself from the mournful family. all these characteristics are based on author himself experience. of course, these stuffs also connected with the society at that time, which class you came from can be the first to affect who you were or how you were, in order to change your social status, the most important was to change the class you belonged to. all these ideology created both lawrence and his william. last but not the least i want to point out is oedipus complex which showing explicitly in the novel, peculiarly on paul, the younger son who faced the difficulty when his love countered to miss miriam, the deeply love towards his mother----mrs. morel, which was clanged his tightly. he can find his true love until one he emancipated himself from his mothersquo;s love. paul would be entangled with dilemma every time when he stayed with miriam;

he could not love her from heart as his will and another hand, he cansquo;t abandon his love to his mother. as a generally thought, mrs. morel was regarded as lawrencesquo;s mother----lydia, miss miriam was recognized as lawrencesquo;s first girlfriend----jessie. in this point, lawrence endowed his oedipus complex on his paul, in the novel, the agonized and miserable love was showed incisively and vividly. from all above, we can see distinctly, the novel----- sons and lovers is an autobiography of lawrence himself, not only on the background of the society, family, but also the personality of the leading character. from the novel, we can have a glimpse of lawrencesquo;s private life;

a talent suffered from his anguished and miserable love, and shackle of class.

《情人》的读后感篇6

?儿子与情人》是英国作家劳伦斯的第一部长篇小说。小说中的父亲莫雷尔是一名矿工，遇到其妻子两人相爱并结婚，但婚后不久，由于长期的沉重劳动和煤井事故使他脾气暴躁，夫妇两人经常发生争吵，慢慢发觉原来两人之间的爱情只是昙花一现。母亲开始将自己的全部感情都放在自己的孩子身上。

一开始，母亲最看好长子威廉，希望他能出人头地，但是威廉在去伦敦当律师的时候过度劳累致死。大儿子去世后，莫雷尔太太则把全部希望寄予在小儿子保罗身上。围绕着保罗的除了母爱，还有和米莉安、克拉拉的爱情，在恋爱的过程中，保罗因一直爱着自己的母亲而无法真正地爱上其他女人。他和米莉安兴趣相投、渐渐擦出火花，然而米莉安想在精神上占据保罗使他喘不过气，莫雷尔太太也对她没有好感，保罗进退两难，最终放弃了米莉安。和米莉安分手后，保罗又与克拉拉相恋，但两人之间的爱情不是灵魂的结合，只是肉体上的狂欢，短暂的激情过后注定要破灭。

母亲在保罗的身上倾注了太多母爱以至于这种感情变得畸形，一定程度上也在摧毁保罗，在母亲的影响下，保罗无法做出自己选择、走自己的道路，一直到母亲去世，他才挣脱束缚，真正长大。

小说除了描写这一畸形的感情，还批判了英国工业社会中的物质文明，强调人应坚持原始的本性。

《情人》的读后感篇7

很多读后感喜欢把《情人》开篇的一段文字当成自己读后感的开头，王小波说那个开头：无限沧桑尽在其中。

去书店买《情人》回家看，也的确是受王小波的鼓动。王小波在《我的师承》里提到了一种阅读方式：他用查良铮（穆旦）翻译的做例子，告诉我们文字不是用来看的，是用来读的。好的文字，应该像黄钟大吕一样琅琅上口。于是在看完他的杂文集后，我也要买来《情人》好好读读，毕竟最优秀的作者在搞翻译。我很乐意享受个人世界，我读《情人》的时候是个晚上。那天晚上我在超市买了卤菜，在小区的菜市场买了小南瓜，我特地煮了小米粥——近几日的忙碌，胃有点不舒服。

我开了电视，是5-12四川汶川大地震的消息。人在吃饭后就悲恸不已。

我冲了杯普洱，苦。

“一个年轻人的青春是美的，一个老人的苍老同样是美的。”我明白那个道理。不过我还是被吸引了。杜拉斯的文字晦涩，深奥，却拥有一股神气的力量使我无法中途放弃。可以是对爱情的向往，解读，可以是对悲惨命运的挣脱，然而那些字背后，自己感觉到的却是无尽的绝望。这样的情绪，一丝丝、一缕缕、从眼皮流淌出来，弥漫在整个房间里。将我缠绕其中，无法脱身。

真是那样。于是普洱茶在午夜12点后更苦。

我还是继续翻着，几页几页的断章。和文章的主题无关，和爱情无关，和命运无关。但杜拉斯还是写着。我知道那是她的手法，和电影里的蒙太奇手法一样。幕布一盖，换了个场景，但依旧是一部电影。这个倒让我想起了王家卫，我喜欢王家卫的电影，因此我也理解了《情人》中的这个手法。手法相似，不存在模仿和抄袭，正如一套好的相机，庸着可以去拥有它，卓越的摄影师也可以拥有它一样。诚然，杜拉斯和王家卫都是优秀的。

cctv-4里曾播放过湄公河。旧照片的颜色。在湄公河的渡船上，西贡的街道上。女孩遇见了那个来自中国北方的男人。杜拉斯叙述的角度很奇特，她的文字很有力量，和刀差不多，她把《情人》约会的每个场景都刻在你脑袋里，你能从文字里看到那些场景，堤岸，中国餐馆，小汽车，寄宿学校，小木屋等等。看《情人》，你仿佛会觉得自己就是主人公，忽然你又变成了观众，忽然你又什么都不是了。

?情人》在那些文字之后开始了情感。在老式的有轨电车上，在喧闹的洒吧里，在海边的小木屋中。《情人》继续他们的情感，他们享受性爱的欢娱，他们享受两人一世界的欢娱。暧昧的气息，跌宕的少女情节。忽然一切嘎然停止，剩下的只有无边无尽的绝望和孤寂，就像经历了一场盛宴，到头来依然孤单一人。

一场感情从开始便充满了绝望。当然，我们不能否定它会绝处逢生。只是杜拉斯让它死亡了。小说毕竟还是小说，奇迹总是奇迹。如果能奇迹也能自然发展，它就不是奇迹了。可以理解一个把爱情当作救命稻草的少女，渴望用爱情来拯救绝望的生活，她在底层不断挣扎，疯狂，然后依然失败，早已注定的失败。她其实看的到自己的失败，可她依旧朝失败走去，这个就是爱情。爱情无法永远，而分离可以。

女孩的有些事情是注定的。

时间带走了一切伤痛，然而温柔还是留在心里。

“我已经老了，有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有一个男人向我走来。他主动介绍自己，他对我说：’我认识你，永远记得你。那时候，你还很年轻，人人都说你美，现在，我是特为来告诉你，对我来说，我觉得现在你比年轻的时候更美，那时你是年轻女人，与你那时的面貌相比，我更爱你现在备受摧残的面容。”

《情人》的读后感篇8

暑假里一个烈日炎炎的午后，我躺在床上百无聊赖，便随手翻起了玛格丽特杜拉斯的《情人》，一下子就被这本薄薄的小书深深地吸引住了。

开头是这么写的：我已经上了年纪，有一天，在一处公共场所的大厅里，有个男人朝我走过来。他在做了一番自我介绍之后对我说：“我始终认识您。大家都说您年轻的时候很漂亮，而我是想告诉您，依我看来，您现在比年轻的时候更漂亮，您从前那张少女的面孔远不如今天这副被毁坏的容颜更使我喜欢。”多么温情默默的开头，让我想起了叶芝的那首诗《当你老了》，“多少人爱你青春欢畅的时辰，爱慕你的美丽，假意或真心，只有一个人爱你那朝圣者的灵魂，爱你衰老了的脸上痛苦的皱纹”。我猜想，《情人》一定是一个无比动人的爱情故事，或许还很传奇。

怀着无比期待和激动的心情，我一口气就看完了这本书。读完之后，感觉内心特别压抑、字里行间那种悲凄感、颓靡感、孤独感令我喘不过气，杜拉斯不愧是大师，《情人》确实给人以震撼的快感。书中有两个情节给我留下了难以磨灭的印象。一个是白人姑娘透过人山人海看到自己的情人结婚的情景，四目相对时那男人眼中的孱弱与无奈和女孩眼中带着坚强和倔强的近似绝望的神情；中国有句古诗“恨不相逢未嫁时”就算相逢未嫁时有什么用呢，目睹心爱的人结婚还要什么比这更残酷和凄惶呢？！另一个情节是女孩在归国的轮渡上，看到巨轮笛声长鸣，吊板缓缓升起，拖轮启航远离岸边时，她开始饮泣了，但那是既没有眼泪，又没有声音的低泣，就连前来送行的妈妈和小哥哥都不曾发现。她伤心欲绝，也像上次一样倚船栏上，她知道情人也正在凝望自己。悲哉！我离君天涯，君隔我海角。“她突然不敢肯定她没爱过这个男人，没有这种她没有见过的爱情，因为这爱情已经在历史中消逝，就象流水消失在沙漠里一样。可现在，也仅仅是现在，当这首乐曲撒遍大海的时候，她才重新发现这种业已消逝的爱情。”无论女孩以前如何否定她爱那个男人，此情此景下，分别在即，她也只能放纵自己低低的啜泣，那是何等的无望阿，或许这辈子再无法缘相见吧，而她那么努力压抑的情感其实一直都在，浓郁似火般被她浇灭在心间。情极至毒呵！

这本书让我想起作家池莉的一句话：文学是一个关于绝望的故事。的确，《情人》之所以被那么多人喜欢也许就在这绝望中的爱情吧。一个贫穷的生活艰辛的白人女孩和一个中国的富家少爷在半殖民地的越南，跨越种族、跨越偏见、跨越阶层相爱了，这爱本身就是一种无望，一种对非理性的偏执与迷恋，压抑感与绝望感在书中随处可见。抛开那些炫丽的写作技巧，大量的.意识流和心理描写以及纵横交错的时空变换，我认为作品本身的感染力和吸引力还在于情感。杜拉斯写这部自传性小说时候的心境我们不得而知，可我猜想，过了那么多年已经功成名就的她却始终忘不了16岁的那段短暂而悲壮的爱情，初恋的记忆穿越时空，还停留在对一段爱情的回眸和对一个男人的怀念之中。它的爆发可以划破沉寂的长空，震惊整个世界，这该是怎样刻骨铭心的一段恋情！就像作品最后那个中国男人说“他和从前一样，仍然爱着她，说他永远无法扯断对她的爱，他将至死爱着她”，情深不寿，正因为爱得深，那种无法爱、爱不到的煎熬才来得深刻、来得长久。我认为，《情人》整本书其实就是杜拉斯在向我们讲述一个关乎绝望的故事。爱情是孤独和绝望结出来的红苹果，鲜嫩美好的外表下是绝望的毒汁在四溢阿！我读过的西方文学作品中关于爱情绝望的女性还有两个。一个是狄更斯《远大前程》中老处女郝维辛小姐，令一个是福克纳《献给艾米丽的玫瑰》中的艾米丽小姐，两位老处女都是把内心的绝望辐射到生活的其他角落，实施刻毒的爱情计划来折磨他人，而最终驯服她们的都是那比爱情更能持久、那战胜了爱情的熬煎的永恒的长眠。包括情人在内的这三部作品，的确验证了池莉的那句话，文学是一个关于绝望的故事。

很久很久以后，也许我的记忆里还会有《情人》中的一些琐碎的片段和细节，它并不像巴尔扎克和托尔斯泰的鸿篇巨制那么正统，可它的确让我思考，思考关于爱情、关于生活的那些细腻与微妙之处。

《情人》的读后感8篇相关文章：